Richmar Portable Ultrasound: US 1000 vs US Pro 2000
By Physiotherapy & Electrotherapy Equipment | Balego | Published: 2026-10-27
Category: Comparisons
Compare the Richmar US 1000 and US Pro 2000 portable therapeutic ultrasound units. Learn which model fits your clinical or home needs based on output modes and portability.
Quick answer
Choose the Richmar US 1000 for straightforward pulsed ultrasound with three output settings, or the US Pro 2000 if you also need continuous operation for deeper or varied treatment protocols.
Understanding the key difference: pulsed vs continuous output
The main distinction between these two portable therapeutic ultrasound units is the type of output they offer. Pulsed ultrasound delivers energy in bursts, which can be useful for reducing tissue heating while still providing mechanical effects. Continuous output, on the other hand, provides a steady stream of ultrasound energy, which is often preferred for thermal effects.
If your treatment plans require both modes, the US Pro 2000 gives you that flexibility. If you only need pulsed therapy, the US 1000 is a simpler, more cost-effective option.
Portability and storage
Both models are designed for convenient transport and storage, making them suitable for clinicians who travel between sites or for patients managing home therapy. The compact design of each unit means you can easily pack them in a bag without sacrificing functionality.
However, the US Pro 2000's additional continuous mode may come with a slightly more complex interface, so consider whether you need that extra capability before deciding.
How to choose between the US 1000 and US Pro 2000
- US 1000: Pulsed-only simplicity: Choose this if your protocols exclusively use pulsed ultrasound. It offers three output selections, which is enough for many soft-tissue and pain-relief applications. Confirm your treatment protocols only require pulsed mode before committing.
- US Pro 2000: Pulsed plus continuous flexibility: Choose this if you need both pulsed and continuous output. The continuous mode allows for thermal effects that can be beneficial for deeper tissue healing. If you anticipate needing continuous mode in the future, the US Pro 2000 avoids the need for a second device.
- Budget and portability trade-off: The US 1000 is priced lower (USD 121.71 vs USD 171.42), making it a more accessible entry point. Both units are compact, but the US Pro 2000's added functionality may justify the higher cost for versatile clinical use. Weigh the price difference against how often you'll use continuous mode.
Product facts at a glance
- Richmar Portable Therapeutic Ultrasound | US 1000 & US Pro 2000: The Richmar US 1000 provides straightforward pulsed ultrasound with three output selections, while the US Pro 2000 adds pulsed and continuous operation. If you only need pulsed therapy, the US 1000 is simpler and more budget-friendly; if you need continuous mode for thermal treatments, the US Pro 2000 is the necessary upgrade.
Richmar Portable Therapeutic Ultrasound | US 1000 & US Pro 2000
Who should choose which?
Best for
- Clinicians who primarily use pulsed ultrasound for acute injuries or pain management
- Users on a tighter budget who want a reliable portable unit with straightforward controls
Not for
- Therapists who need continuous output for thermal treatments or who want the flexibility to switch modes mid-session
